Message412160
| Author | gvanrossum |
|---|---|
| Recipients | AlexWaygood, JelleZijlstra, gvanrossum, kj, sobolevn |
| Date | 2022-01-30.16:28:29 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1643560109.92.0.457862754662.issue46571@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I agree that Jelle's proposal (Nikita's #2) looks best *if* we can implement it.
How do we ensure that
class A:
...
@no_type_check
class B:
AA = A
class C:
...
...
suppresses annotations in B and C but not in A? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-01-30 16:28:29 | gvanrossum | set | recipients: + gvanrossum, JelleZijlstra, sobolevn, kj, AlexWaygood |
| 2022-01-30 16:28:29 | gvanrossum | set | messageid: <1643560109.92.0.457862754662.issue46571@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2022-01-30 16:28:29 | gvanrossum | link | issue46571 messages |
| 2022-01-30 16:28:29 | gvanrossum | create | |