Message412662
| Author | GBeauregard |
|---|---|
| Recipients | AlexWaygood, GBeauregard, Gobot1234, JelleZijlstra, gvanrossum, kj, levkivskyi, serhiy.storchaka, sobolevn |
| Date | 2022-02-06.20:28:55 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1644179335.08.0.163644871148.issue46644@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I compiled your PR to run it and was testing in 3.10 as well, but I was testing in a file with from __future__ import annotations unintentionally. I retract the comment. It turns out `list[42]` is okay though, which I suppose is more relevant going forward. My confusion here is sort of the crux of my problem with these runtime checks: they are inconsistently applied in different locations which is why callable() was causing a lot of bugs. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-02-06 20:28:55 | GBeauregard | set | recipients: + GBeauregard, gvanrossum, serhiy.storchaka, levkivskyi, JelleZijlstra, sobolevn, Gobot1234, kj, AlexWaygood |
| 2022-02-06 20:28:55 | GBeauregard | set | messageid: <1644179335.08.0.163644871148.issue46644@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2022-02-06 20:28:55 | GBeauregard | link | issue46644 messages |
| 2022-02-06 20:28:55 | GBeauregard | create | |