Message414344
| Author | Mark.Shannon |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Mark.Shannon, miss-islington, nedbat, petr.viktorin, scoder, vstinner |
| Date | 2022-03-02.13:31:15 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1646227876.06.0.140407373559.issue40421@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I've outlined the requirements for a frame stack API at https://github.com/faster-cpython/ideas/issues/309. The problem with adding an API for PyFrameObject (beyond simple getters) is that it makes assumptions about the frame stack that aren't valid. A stack of frames is not just a linked list of frames. It never was, and it certainly isn't now. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-03-02 13:31:16 | Mark.Shannon | set | recipients: + Mark.Shannon, scoder, vstinner, nedbat, petr.viktorin, miss-islington |
| 2022-03-02 13:31:16 | Mark.Shannon | set | messageid: <1646227876.06.0.140407373559.issue40421@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2022-03-02 13:31:16 | Mark.Shannon | link | issue40421 messages |
| 2022-03-02 13:31:15 | Mark.Shannon | create | |