Message414709
| Author | gvanrossum |
|---|---|
| Recipients | AlexWaygood, FHTMitchell, JelleZijlstra, Steven Silvester, dlukes, eric.smith, graingert, gvanrossum, kj, levkivskyi, python-dev, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, sobolevn |
| Date | 2022-03-08.00:37:42 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1646699862.89.0.661318357028.issue43923@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Playing tricks where compile-time and run-time see slightly different types is probably more productive than trying to revert a PR that was in Python 3.9 and 3.10. :-) I'm not opposed to supporting generic NamedTuple, but I expect the fix will never hit 3.9 and 3.10, and it needs to be a "fix forward" PR. Would you mind closing the "revert" PR unmerged? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-03-08 00:37:43 | gvanrossum | set | recipients: + gvanrossum, rhettinger, eric.smith, python-dev, serhiy.storchaka, graingert, levkivskyi, dlukes, JelleZijlstra, FHTMitchell, Steven Silvester, sobolevn, kj, AlexWaygood |
| 2022-03-08 00:37:42 | gvanrossum | set | messageid: <1646699862.89.0.661318357028.issue43923@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2022-03-08 00:37:42 | gvanrossum | link | issue43923 messages |
| 2022-03-08 00:37:42 | gvanrossum | create | |