Message415443
| Author | brett.cannon |
|---|---|
| Recipients | brett.cannon, eric.smith, eryksun, graingert, jaraco |
| Date | 2022-03-17.19:22:31 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1647544951.79.0.381152668368.issue47025@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I think it depends on whether we want to say the standard/included/built-in import mechanisms don't support byte paths, or byte paths are entirely not supported even for 3rd-party code? I definitely think we should at least do the former, but I'm hesitant to close the door for those that need it by doing the latter. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-03-17 19:22:31 | brett.cannon | set | recipients: + brett.cannon, jaraco, eric.smith, eryksun, graingert |
| 2022-03-17 19:22:31 | brett.cannon | set | messageid: <1647544951.79.0.381152668368.issue47025@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2022-03-17 19:22:31 | brett.cannon | link | issue47025 messages |
| 2022-03-17 19:22:31 | brett.cannon | create | |