Message55343
| Author | gagern |
|---|---|
| Recipients | barry, collinwinter, gagern, georg.brandl |
| Date | 2007-08-28.00:32:36 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.18554758 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1188261157.31.0.633528338059.issue1670765@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Looks like I missed your comments on this patch. What kind of tests do you have in mind? Tests demonstrating where current implementation fails and my patch will help? Or rather tests checking that this patch won't break anything else? The former would be easy enough, but for the latter I'm not sure how far this would go, as people tend to make strange assumptions I would never have thought of. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2007-08-28 00:32:37 | gagern | set | spambayes_score: 0.185548 -> 0.18554758 recipients: + gagern, barry, georg.brandl, collinwinter |
| 2007-08-28 00:32:37 | gagern | set | spambayes_score: 0.185548 -> 0.185548 messageid: <1188261157.31.0.633528338059.issue1670765@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2007-08-28 00:32:37 | gagern | link | issue1670765 messages |
| 2007-08-28 00:32:36 | gagern | create | |