Message 57458 - Python tracker

Message57458

Author	janssen
Recipients	complex, gvanrossum, janssen
Date	2007-11-13.16:22:50
SpamBayes Score	0.0033109633
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<4b3e516a0711130822y4878f6ddj37aa043cb40a4f7d@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to	<1194888628.5.0.0687855073674.issue1419@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
About the same as two weeks ago... I have a functional patch, or rather, I have a patch that would work if the issues with socket closing are resolved the way I suggested :-). I've been waiting to see what's going to happen with the socket module. Bill On 11/12/07, Guido van Rossum <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Guido van Rossum added the comment: > > BTW Bill, how's the 3.0 port of SSL going? > > ---------- > nosy: +gvanrossum > > __________________________________ > Tracker <report@bugs.python.org> > <http://bugs.python.org/issue1419> > __________________________________ >

Content

About the same as two weeks ago...  I have a functional patch, or
rather, I have a patch that would work if the issues with socket
closing are resolved the way I suggested :-).  I've been waiting to
see what's going to happen with the socket module.

Bill

On 11/12/07, Guido van Rossum <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> Guido van Rossum added the comment:
>
> BTW Bill, how's the 3.0 port of SSL going?
>
> ----------
> nosy: +gvanrossum
>
> __________________________________
> Tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1419>
> __________________________________
>

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2007-11-13 16:22:51	janssen	set	spambayes_score: 0.00331096 -> 0.0033109633 recipients: + janssen, gvanrossum, complex
2007-11-13 16:22:51	janssen	link	issue1419 messages
2007-11-13 16:22:50	janssen	create