Message58642
| Author | taleinat |
|---|---|
| Recipients | kbk, taleinat |
| Date | 2007-12-14.23:33:18 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.31531888 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1197675199.21.0.51008364465.issue1350@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Now for CallTipWindow.py: * split conditionals into two lines as requested * changed the test (took me a while to understand what "controversy" you were referring to...) I couldn't find anything wrong with the first line. It is the function/method signature if it was found, or just the beginning of the doc-string otherwise. Unless you think the adding the signature (when possible) is unnecessary/confusing... The above changes are included in both new patches. |
|
| Files | |
|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded |
| IDLE_CallTips.071214.patch | taleinat, 2007-12-14.23:33:18 |
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2007-12-14 23:33:19 | taleinat | set | spambayes_score: 0.315319 -> 0.31531888 recipients: + taleinat, kbk |
| 2007-12-14 23:33:19 | taleinat | set | spambayes_score: 0.315319 -> 0.315319 messageid: <1197675199.21.0.51008364465.issue1350@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2007-12-14 23:33:19 | taleinat | link | issue1350 messages |
| 2007-12-14 23:33:18 | taleinat | create | |