Message 58710 - Python tracker

Message58710

Author	gvanrossum
Recipients	christian.heimes, gvanrossum, nascheme, noam, rhettinger, tim.peters
Date	2007-12-17.22:56:49
SpamBayes Score	0.28320765
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<ca471dc20712171456s75246564tde13eab69f5d8bbb@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to	<1197928400.58.0.0155950146692.issue1580@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
This is what I was thinking of before, although I'd use "%.16g"%f and "%.17g"%f instead of str(f) and repr(f), and I'd use float() instead of eval(). I suspect that it doesn't satisfy Tim Peters though, because this may depend on a rounding bug in the local platform's input function.

Content

This is what I was thinking of before, although I'd use "%.16g"%f and
"%.17g"%f instead of str(f) and repr(f), and I'd use float() instead
of eval().

I suspect that it doesn't satisfy Tim Peters though, because this may
depend on a rounding bug in the local platform's input function.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2007-12-17 22:56:50	gvanrossum	set	spambayes_score: 0.283208 -> 0.28320765 recipients: + gvanrossum, tim.peters, nascheme, rhettinger, christian.heimes, noam
2007-12-17 22:56:49	gvanrossum	link	issue1580 messages
2007-12-17 22:56:49	gvanrossum	create