Message60126
| Author | loewis |
|---|---|
| Recipients | alexandre.vassalotti, christian.heimes, donmez, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, loewis |
| Date | 2008-01-18.23:40:40 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.028698528 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <479138F6.8080209@v.loewis.de> |
| In-reply-to | <1200682223.46.0.349461590595.issue1621@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Btw I think we need an unsigned version of Py_ssize_t to fix this > problem cleanly. I am not sure if you would agree with me though. There is an unsigned version, it's called "size_t". |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008-01-18 23:40:41 | loewis | set | spambayes_score: 0.0286985 -> 0.028698528 recipients: + loewis, gvanrossum, gregory.p.smith, christian.heimes, alexandre.vassalotti, donmez |
| 2008-01-18 23:40:40 | loewis | link | issue1621 messages |
| 2008-01-18 23:40:40 | loewis | create | |