Message62065
| Author | ncoghlan |
|---|---|
| Recipients | dalke, ncoghlan, nnorwitz |
| Date | 2008-02-05.11:31:18 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.057006206 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1202211079.6.0.474441778498.issue2009@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I don't have any objection in principle, but I would like to see the updated rules based on the 2.6 and 3.0 Grammar files (they should only be minor variants of what you have already done for 2.5) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008-02-05 11:31:19 | ncoghlan | set | spambayes_score: 0.0570062 -> 0.057006206 recipients: + ncoghlan, nnorwitz, dalke |
| 2008-02-05 11:31:19 | ncoghlan | set | spambayes_score: 0.0570062 -> 0.0570062 messageid: <1202211079.6.0.474441778498.issue2009@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008-02-05 11:31:18 | ncoghlan | link | issue2009 messages |
| 2008-02-05 11:31:18 | ncoghlan | create | |