Message62316
| Author | amaury.forgeotdarc |
|---|---|
| Recipients | amaury.forgeotdarc, christian.heimes, facundobatista, kcwu |
| Date | 2008-02-12.13:14:49 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.014594059 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1202822090.32.0.6138883623.issue2063@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
As a suggestion, we could just run some computation that does no system call: >>> import os >>> os.times() (0.015625, 0.015625, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0) >>> max(xrange(10000000)) # this takes half a second on my machine 9999999 >>> os.times() (0.015625, 0.484375, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0) utime delta should be much higher than stime delta. This is obviously not the case here; the values seems inverted. (os.times() -> (utime, stime, cutime, cstime, elapsed_time)) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008-02-12 13:14:50 | amaury.forgeotdarc | set | spambayes_score: 0.0145941 -> 0.014594059 recipients: + amaury.forgeotdarc, facundobatista, christian.heimes, kcwu |
| 2008-02-12 13:14:50 | amaury.forgeotdarc | set | spambayes_score: 0.0145941 -> 0.0145941 messageid: <1202822090.32.0.6138883623.issue2063@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008-02-12 13:14:49 | amaury.forgeotdarc | link | issue2063 messages |
| 2008-02-12 13:14:49 | amaury.forgeotdarc | create | |