Message63020
| Author | belopolsky |
|---|---|
| Recipients | _doublep, belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, gvanrossum, nnorwitz, rhettinger |
| Date | 2008-02-26.01:44:35 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.059613522 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1203990278.54.0.846993384879.issue1394@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Paul, You are right. I misunderstood that comment myself. I've tried the attached modification to your patch (unreachable-code-1.diff) and it passes all tests while fixing msg62953 problem: $ cat t.py def f(): return 1 1+2 from dis import dis dis(f) $ ./python.exe t.py 6 0 LOAD_CONST 0 (None) 3 RETURN_VALUE |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008-02-26 01:44:38 | belopolsky | set | spambayes_score: 0.0596135 -> 0.059613522 recipients: + belopolsky, gvanrossum, nnorwitz, rhettinger, _doublep, benjamin.peterson |
| 2008-02-26 01:44:38 | belopolsky | set | spambayes_score: 0.0596135 -> 0.0596135 messageid: <1203990278.54.0.846993384879.issue1394@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008-02-26 01:44:37 | belopolsky | link | issue1394 messages |
| 2008-02-26 01:44:36 | belopolsky | create | |