Message63552
| Author | twouters |
|---|---|
| Recipients | belopolsky, gvanrossum, twouters |
| Date | 2008-03-15.16:14:24 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.3194955 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <9e804ac0803150914s4057e405v89ee099d1f1493e9@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1205597534.13.0.0917258826527.issue2292@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Guido van Rossum <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> added the comment: > > Didn't you say it does sets too? Does this work? > a = [1, 2, 3] > {1, *a, 0, 4} # {0, 1, 2, 3, 4} Yes. > > > How about dicts? > kwds = {'z': 0, 'w': 12} > {'x': 1, 'y': 2, **kwds} # {'x': 1, 'y': 2, 'z': 0, 'w': 12} Not yet. > > > Also, now that we support > > [*a, b, c] > > shouldn't we also support > > foo(*a, b, c) > Sure. (And also 'foo(*a, *b, *c)'?) But have you taken a look lately at the function definition grammar? I need some time to sort it out :) |
|
| Files | |
|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded |
| unnamed | twouters, 2008-03-15.16:14:24 |
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008-03-15 16:14:26 | twouters | set | spambayes_score: 0.319495 -> 0.3194955 recipients: + twouters, gvanrossum, belopolsky |
| 2008-03-15 16:14:25 | twouters | link | issue2292 messages |
| 2008-03-15 16:14:25 | twouters | create | |