Message65079
| Author | gvanrossum |
|---|---|
| Recipients | belopolsky, georg.brandl, gvanrossum, twouters |
| Date | 2008-04-07.17:45:10 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.033142067 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1207590312.18.0.938269225928.issue2292@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I think we should either get this into the 3.0a5 release planned for May 7, or wait for 3.1. I'd prefer to see some kind of PEP discussion on the python-3000 list, rather than just a BDFL approval in a tracker issue. I think it's a useful feature (especially now we already have PEP 3132) but we're getting close to the release, so I'd like to see some more eyeballs on this code... I expect the PEP discussion will be short and sweet -- either most folks like it, or we should not push through at this point in time. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008-04-07 17:45:12 | gvanrossum | set | spambayes_score: 0.0331421 -> 0.033142067 recipients: + gvanrossum, twouters, georg.brandl, belopolsky |
| 2008-04-07 17:45:12 | gvanrossum | set | spambayes_score: 0.0331421 -> 0.0331421 messageid: <1207590312.18.0.938269225928.issue2292@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008-04-07 17:45:11 | gvanrossum | link | issue2292 messages |
| 2008-04-07 17:45:10 | gvanrossum | create | |