Message65117
| Author | belopolsky |
|---|---|
| Recipients | belopolsky, georg.brandl, gvanrossum, twouters |
| Date | 2008-04-07.20:15:11 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.009393773 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <d38f5330804071315y8a05763m256dc76c5ef4d47f@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1207598530.32.0.611014449761.issue2292@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Thomas Wouters <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > .. The order of evaluation is the same, the > BUILD_SET implementation just hashes the evaluated items in a different > order. You can't really rely on that particular order as it's tied > closely to the stack representation CPython uses. I agree and that's why I said the difference in behavior is "subtle" and my example is "contrived." However, I believe Raymond expressed a similar concern in msg63065. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008-04-07 20:15:12 | belopolsky | set | spambayes_score: 0.00939377 -> 0.009393773 recipients: + belopolsky, gvanrossum, twouters, georg.brandl |
| 2008-04-07 20:15:11 | belopolsky | link | issue2292 messages |
| 2008-04-07 20:15:11 | belopolsky | create | |