Message67311
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | barry, benjamin.peterson, collinwinter, jyasskin, pitrou |
| Date | 2008-05-24.22:35:22 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.09218791 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1211668531.28.0.383004243714.issue2507@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Here is a hopefully complete patch using the same approach as before. However I'm now convinced that another approach would be better in order to solve both this bug and the various re-raising issues. It would involve replacing most of the set_exc_info() / reset_exc_info() mechanism in ceval.c with something different, probably based on saving/restoring exception state values onto/from the frame stack. Problem is, I'm not sure I'll have time for it very soon. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008-05-24 22:35:32 | pitrou | set | spambayes_score: 0.0921879 -> 0.09218791 recipients: + pitrou, barry, collinwinter, jyasskin, benjamin.peterson |
| 2008-05-24 22:35:31 | pitrou | set | spambayes_score: 0.0921879 -> 0.0921879 messageid: <1211668531.28.0.383004243714.issue2507@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008-05-24 22:35:29 | pitrou | link | issue2507 messages |
| 2008-05-24 22:35:28 | pitrou | create | |