Message67540
| Author | belopolsky |
|---|---|
| Recipients | belopolsky, pitrou, rhettinger |
| Date | 2008-05-30.18:13:24 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.31665158 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <d38f5330805301113t4e4e13afw20b1ec70e6136fa9@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1212169658.25.0.300440049705.issue3008@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Antoine Pitrou <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: .. > 1. while taking the binary representation of an integer has a real > meaning, taking the binary representation of a float only exposes an > implementation detail, that is the internal layout of float numbers. > You may have misunderstood the proposal. I read the proposal as producing the true mathematical radix 2 representation of a float rather than its 64-bit memory layout. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008-05-30 18:13:26 | belopolsky | set | spambayes_score: 0.316652 -> 0.31665158 recipients: + belopolsky, rhettinger, pitrou |
| 2008-05-30 18:13:25 | belopolsky | link | issue3008 messages |
| 2008-05-30 18:13:24 | belopolsky | create | |