Message67676
| Author | terry.reedy |
|---|---|
| Recipients | benjamin.peterson, bgolemon, gvanrossum, mark, pitrou, terry.reedy |
| Date | 2008-06-03.22:29:42 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.020104103 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1212532184.63.0.988353439294.issue2613@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Rationale for banning f(*,**k): it could represent a bug (intended bare name(s) omitted) that should be flagged, a lack of clear understanding of the redundancy, or a somewhat unPythonic stylistic preference for useless redundancy. I consider the first the most likely in practice, though I also did not see the redundancy at first. Guido has used the 'likely a bug' rationale for other design decisions. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008-06-03 22:29:45 | terry.reedy | set | spambayes_score: 0.0201041 -> 0.020104103 recipients: + terry.reedy, gvanrossum, pitrou, mark, benjamin.peterson, bgolemon |
| 2008-06-03 22:29:44 | terry.reedy | set | spambayes_score: 0.0201041 -> 0.0201041 messageid: <1212532184.63.0.988353439294.issue2613@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008-06-03 22:29:43 | terry.reedy | link | issue2613 messages |
| 2008-06-03 22:29:42 | terry.reedy | create | |