Message67761
| Author | amaury.forgeotdarc |
|---|---|
| Recipients | amaury.forgeotdarc, georg.brandl, scoder |
| Date | 2008-06-06.11:45:14 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.003738741 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1212752719.79.0.966890353059.issue2997@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Let me quote a comment from GvR about the similar issue1185: """ Can you redo the patch while keeping the slot *position* (though not the name or type)? The wasted space is minimal (4-8 bytes per type or class object) and it means a lot for third party code if the positional struct initialization never breaks due to insertion or removal of a slot. Since everyone has a zero here anyway, I propose to name the slot nb_reserved and make its type int. """ OTOH, it's python 3.0, and we are allowed to break things... |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008-06-06 11:45:20 | amaury.forgeotdarc | set | spambayes_score: 0.00373874 -> 0.003738741 recipients: + amaury.forgeotdarc, georg.brandl, scoder |
| 2008-06-06 11:45:19 | amaury.forgeotdarc | set | spambayes_score: 0.00373874 -> 0.00373874 messageid: <1212752719.79.0.966890353059.issue2997@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008-06-06 11:45:18 | amaury.forgeotdarc | link | issue2997 messages |
| 2008-06-06 11:45:15 | amaury.forgeotdarc | create | |