Message68368
| Author | roudkerk |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Rhamphoryncus, amaury.forgeotdarc, jnoller, roudkerk, theller |
| Date | 2008-06-18.17:37:25 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.03472402 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1213810657.59.0.0655414271964.issue3125@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> But why this is win32 specific? > > Is it because windows cannot fork(), so data has to be copied through > the pickle mechanism? > In this case let's remove the "if win32" statement, and always execute > the body. Yes, on Windows pickling is needed to pass data to a child process. In other contexts these objects are NOT picklable because you would have to worry about garbage collection of the original object before the copy is rebuilt by the other process. On unix pickling will always fail even if it "if win32" statement was removed. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008-06-18 17:37:38 | roudkerk | set | spambayes_score: 0.034724 -> 0.03472402 recipients: + roudkerk, theller, amaury.forgeotdarc, Rhamphoryncus, jnoller |
| 2008-06-18 17:37:38 | roudkerk | set | spambayes_score: 0.034724 -> 0.034724 messageid: <1213810657.59.0.0655414271964.issue3125@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008-06-18 17:37:34 | roudkerk | link | issue3125 messages |
| 2008-06-18 17:37:32 | roudkerk | create | |