Message68455
| Author | mark.dickinson |
|---|---|
| Recipients | alexandre.vassalotti, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, mark.dickinson, pitrou, rhettinger, terry.reedy |
| Date | 2008-06-20.12:38:21 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.01589014 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1213965502.61.0.98487351018.issue3008@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
The patch looks good to me. It's a bit unfortunate that -0.0 doesn't round-trip correctly (the sign of the zero gets lost): >>> eval(bin(-0.0)) 0.0 I don't know whether it's worth special-casing this; the output would have to be in a different format: '-0b0 * 2.0 ** 0' isn't good enough, since unary minus has higher precedence than multiplication. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008-06-20 12:38:22 | mark.dickinson | set | spambayes_score: 0.0158901 -> 0.01589014 recipients: + mark.dickinson, rhettinger, terry.reedy, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, pitrou, alexandre.vassalotti |
| 2008-06-20 12:38:22 | mark.dickinson | set | spambayes_score: 0.0158901 -> 0.0158901 messageid: <1213965502.61.0.98487351018.issue3008@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008-06-20 12:38:21 | mark.dickinson | link | issue3008 messages |
| 2008-06-20 12:38:21 | mark.dickinson | create | |