Message68990
| Author | jyasskin |
|---|---|
| Recipients | jyasskin, mato2000, werneck, zanella |
| Date | 2008-06-30.04:10:27 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.0011394422 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1214799029.66.0.387501779067.issue2325@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I don't think so. It wouldn't be a bug if I wrote: >>> class Meta(type): ... def __instancecheck__(self, other): ... return True >>> isinstance(3, Meta) ... False but it is a bug that the isinstance call raises an exception. If recent builds no longer raise an exception, then the bug should be closed. You guys also seem to have missed that the examples in PEP 3119 in fact define __instancecheck__ as a normal method on a metaclass (which makes it a classmethod on classes derived from that metaclass) instead of as a classmethod on a metaclass. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008-06-30 04:10:29 | jyasskin | set | spambayes_score: 0.00113944 -> 0.0011394422 recipients: + jyasskin, zanella, werneck, mato2000 |
| 2008-06-30 04:10:29 | jyasskin | set | spambayes_score: 0.00113944 -> 0.00113944 messageid: <1214799029.66.0.387501779067.issue2325@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008-06-30 04:10:28 | jyasskin | link | issue2325 messages |
| 2008-06-30 04:10:27 | jyasskin | create | |