Message70128
| Author | stutzbach |
|---|---|
| Recipients | mark.dickinson, nirinA, rhettinger, stutzbach, terry.reedy |
| Date | 2008-07-21.23:20:43 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.05854923 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <eae285400807211620i3b3ef19h4a62097bb821b4d3@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1216679684.4.0.943072620014.issue3366@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Raymond Hettinger <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > There are several different approximations to choose from. Each of > them has their own implications for speed and accuracy. FWIW, the current patch dynamically selects one of a few different approximation methods based on the input value. +1 on kicking it around and comparing the output with that from other mathematics tools. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008-07-21 23:20:44 | stutzbach | set | spambayes_score: 0.0585492 -> 0.05854923 recipients: + stutzbach, rhettinger, terry.reedy, mark.dickinson, nirinA |
| 2008-07-21 23:20:44 | stutzbach | link | issue3366 messages |
| 2008-07-21 23:20:43 | stutzbach | create | |