Message70228
| Author | rhettinger |
|---|---|
| Recipients | fredrikj, loewis, rhettinger |
| Date | 2008-07-24.21:39:56 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.25514093 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1216935598.26.0.118628105023.issue3439@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Another reason to leave frexp() untouched is that it is tightly coupled to ldexp() as its inverse, for a lossless roundtrip: assert ldexp(*frexp(pi)) == pi This relationship is bound to get mucked-up or confused if frexp starts accepting large integers that are no exactly representable as floats (i.e. 2**100+1). |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008-07-24 21:39:58 | rhettinger | set | spambayes_score: 0.255141 -> 0.25514093 recipients: + rhettinger, loewis, fredrikj |
| 2008-07-24 21:39:58 | rhettinger | set | spambayes_score: 0.255141 -> 0.255141 messageid: <1216935598.26.0.118628105023.issue3439@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008-07-24 21:39:57 | rhettinger | link | issue3439 messages |
| 2008-07-24 21:39:56 | rhettinger | create | |