Message70503
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou |
| Date | 2008-07-31.14:20:42 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.0044800453 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1217514046.95.0.948227194743.issue3476@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Here is a sample implementation (using a fixed-size bytearray) with test. Amaury, would you like to take a look? I'm a bit puzzled by the shady BufferedRandom semantics: though the tests do pass, it's hard to say why e.g. BufferedRandom.tell() was implemented like that. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008-07-31 14:20:47 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, amaury.forgeotdarc |
| 2008-07-31 14:20:46 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1217514046.95.0.948227194743.issue3476@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008-07-31 14:20:46 | pitrou | link | issue3476 messages |
| 2008-07-31 14:20:45 | pitrou | create | |