Message70561
| Author | loewis |
|---|---|
| Recipients | amaury.forgeotdarc, benjamin.peterson, loewis, pitrou |
| Date | 2008-08-01.15:45:38 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.009899292 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1217605539.5.0.942982690815.issue3476@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I don't think the proposed patch (file11012) makes it thread-safe, and I believe you cannot get it thread-safe without using thread synchronization. For example, if two threads simultaneously determine that there is still space left (len(b) <= free), they might both write to self._write_buf and self._write_end, and the last writer would win. (In case it isn't clear how this might happen: thread 1 exhausts its Py_Ticker just after checking the size, then thread 2 runs a full .write(), then thread 1 continues filling the buffer) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008-08-01 15:45:39 | loewis | set | recipients: + loewis, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, benjamin.peterson |
| 2008-08-01 15:45:39 | loewis | set | messageid: <1217605539.5.0.942982690815.issue3476@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008-08-01 15:45:38 | loewis | link | issue3476 messages |
| 2008-08-01 15:45:38 | loewis | create | |