Message70595
| Author | loewis |
|---|---|
| Recipients | amaury.forgeotdarc, barry, benjamin.peterson, donmez, gpolo, loewis, pitrou, teoliphant |
| Date | 2008-08-01.21:44:34 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.01177758 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <489383C0.4020607@v.loewis.de> |
| In-reply-to | <1217605582.48932fce9282b@imp.free.fr> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> I don't know, is there supposed to be a semantic difference between > PyObject_ReleaseBuffer and PyBuffer_Release? If not, I'd say drop it. There are existing callers of it which would need to be changed, perhaps outside the core also; plus it's in PEP 3118. Technically, they do the same. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008-08-01 21:44:41 | loewis | set | recipients: + loewis, barry, teoliphant, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, donmez, benjamin.peterson, gpolo |
| 2008-08-01 21:44:34 | loewis | link | issue3139 messages |
| 2008-08-01 21:44:34 | loewis | create | |