Message 71426 - Python tracker

Message71426

Author	jnoller
Recipients	barry, benjamin.peterson, jnoller, mishok13, ncoghlan
Date	2008-08-19.15:36:29
SpamBayes Score	6.663709e-06
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<4222a8490808190836ib5f1eefj45b1014742ad9091@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to	<1219160096.2.0.499511557815.issue3352@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Nick Coghlan <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> added the comment: > > is_alive appears to be a potentially expensive check for the > multiprocessing side of things, which is why I'm inclined to leave it as > a method. "if t.is_alive():" actually reads better to me than "if > t.alive:" anyway. Dang, I already cut that one over.

Content

On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Nick Coghlan <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> is_alive appears to be a potentially expensive check for the
> multiprocessing side of things, which is why I'm inclined to leave it as
> a method. "if t.is_alive():" actually reads better to me than "if
> t.alive:" anyway.

Dang, I already cut that one over.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-08-19 15:36:30	jnoller	set	recipients: + jnoller, barry, ncoghlan, benjamin.peterson, mishok13
2008-08-19 15:36:29	jnoller	link	issue3352 messages
2008-08-19 15:36:29	jnoller	create