Message71456
| Author | jnoller |
|---|---|
| Recipients | barry, benjamin.peterson, jnoller, mishok13, ncoghlan |
| Date | 2008-08-19.18:20:52 |
| SpamBayes Score | 3.505906e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <4222a8490808191120l1e50b507r3e63f370f0a60562@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1219162246.31.0.262038607589.issue3352@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> > Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> added the comment: > > Note regarding those comments - only the exitcode one is something we > should try to get sorted for the beta. Backing out the deprecation > warnings and cleaning up the documentation can wait for the first > release candidate. > Would it be acceptable to add a doc note mentioning .exitcode() may block rather than changing it back to the get_exitcode method? It's not that it's hard - but I do like the consistency of the property-style interface. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008-08-19 18:20:55 | jnoller | set | recipients: + jnoller, barry, ncoghlan, benjamin.peterson, mishok13 |
| 2008-08-19 18:20:53 | jnoller | link | issue3352 messages |
| 2008-08-19 18:20:52 | jnoller | create | |