Message72153
| Author | georg.brandl |
|---|---|
| Recipients | amaury.forgeotdarc, georg.brandl, hagen |
| Date | 2008-08-29.19:56:44 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.0007018335 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1220039805.95.0.912114357074.issue3729@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
That is *not* wanted. We had a discussion on the list about changing the return value of the sq_length slot to allow larger lengths to be reported, and while I don't recall why this wasn't done, I do recall that the consensus was that if Py_ssize_t remains, len() should raise rather than lie for larger values- |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008-08-29 19:56:46 | georg.brandl | set | recipients: + georg.brandl, amaury.forgeotdarc, hagen |
| 2008-08-29 19:56:45 | georg.brandl | set | messageid: <1220039805.95.0.912114357074.issue3729@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008-08-29 19:56:45 | georg.brandl | link | issue3729 messages |
| 2008-08-29 19:56:44 | georg.brandl | create | |