Message73918
| Author | ncoghlan |
|---|---|
| Recipients | aimacintyre, djmdjm, jnoller, ncoghlan |
| Date | 2008-09-27.02:51:29 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.00021839672 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1222483890.46.0.536317141973.issue3770@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Looking at mp.synchronize, the whole module really does depend on a working _multiprocessing.SemLock instance. If these platforms don't have a native semaphore implementation, what is their basic inter-process synchronisation primitive? Once that is identified, then it should be possible to code either a C or Python semaphore implementation based on that primitive. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008-09-27 02:51:30 | ncoghlan | set | recipients: + ncoghlan, aimacintyre, djmdjm, jnoller |
| 2008-09-27 02:51:30 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1222483890.46.0.536317141973.issue3770@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008-09-27 02:51:29 | ncoghlan | link | issue3770 messages |
| 2008-09-27 02:51:29 | ncoghlan | create | |