Message74749
| Author | mark.dickinson |
|---|---|
| Recipients | fredrikj, loewis, mark.dickinson, rhettinger, terry.reedy, vstinner |
| Date | 2008-10-14.15:07:22 |
| SpamBayes Score | 2.8299843e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1223996843.21.0.206863276162.issue3439@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Accidentally removed the following message from Victor Stinner; apologies. (Time to turn off tap-to-click on my trackpad, methinks.) > See also issue #3724 which proposes to support long integers for > math.log2(). One other note: in Fredrik's patch there's commented out code for a numbits *property* (rather than a method). Is there any good reason to make this a property? I don't have a good feeling for when something should be a method and when it should be a property, but in this case I'd be inclined to leave numbits as a method. Are there general guidelines for making things properties? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008-10-14 15:07:23 | mark.dickinson | set | recipients: + mark.dickinson, loewis, rhettinger, terry.reedy, vstinner, fredrikj |
| 2008-10-14 15:07:23 | mark.dickinson | set | messageid: <1223996843.21.0.206863276162.issue3439@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008-10-14 15:07:22 | mark.dickinson | link | issue3439 messages |
| 2008-10-14 15:07:22 | mark.dickinson | create | |