Message77479
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | amaury.forgeotdarc, vstinner |
| Date | 2008-12-10.02:54:18 |
| SpamBayes Score | 9.15716e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1228877659.77.0.953829873679.issue3999@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Oh, another change in segfault-3.patch: - disable signal handler before the first call to segfault_enter() and the last call to segfault_exit() About the memory footprint: it would be possible to use variable size buffer using malloc() and then realloc(). But static buffers are easier to use, and I don't want to play with malloc() while I'm handling a segmentation fault or stack overflow :-) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008-12-10 02:54:20 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, amaury.forgeotdarc |
| 2008-12-10 02:54:19 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1228877659.77.0.953829873679.issue3999@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008-12-10 02:54:19 | vstinner | link | issue3999 messages |
| 2008-12-10 02:54:18 | vstinner | create | |