Message77796
| Author | ajaksu2 |
|---|---|
| Recipients | ResulCetin, ajaksu2, amaury.forgeotdarc, dato, exarkun, jhylton, pitrou |
| Date | 2008-12-14.12:17:17 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.009115517 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1229257038.45.0.364057050521.issue4631@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Clarifying the diagnosis, the offending spurious bytes are only present when we use 3.0's GET above. That's because urllib.request.HTTPHandler asks for a vanilla http.client.HTTPConnection, which uses HTTP 1.1. IIUC, either we change the request version back to 1.0 (attached patch) or correct the way the response is processed (is it at all?). I think HTTPSHandler will also suffer from this, perhaps [Fancy]URLopener too. [Antoine: cool, an edit conflict that agrees with what I was about to post :D] |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008-12-14 12:17:18 | ajaksu2 | set | recipients: + ajaksu2, jhylton, exarkun, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, dato, ResulCetin |
| 2008-12-14 12:17:18 | ajaksu2 | set | messageid: <1229257038.45.0.364057050521.issue4631@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008-12-14 12:17:17 | ajaksu2 | link | issue4631 messages |
| 2008-12-14 12:17:17 | ajaksu2 | create | |