Message77918
| Author | skip.montanaro |
|---|---|
| Recipients | fredrikj, loewis, mark.dickinson, pitrou, rhettinger, skip.montanaro, terry.reedy, vstinner |
| Date | 2008-12-16.18:33:18 |
| SpamBayes Score | 2.576595e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1229452400.39.0.130886056827.issue3439@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Regarding the last few posts: * Raymond's implementation, while ugly, provides a completely orthogonal way to test compute numbits, useful in unit tests if nothing else. * Using x >> 1 in a reference implementation is perfectly reasonable. If the person using the reference implementation to produce a real C-based implementation doesn't understand the equivalence of x // 2 and x >> 1, heaven help us. Skip |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008-12-16 18:33:20 | skip.montanaro | set | recipients: + skip.montanaro, loewis, rhettinger, terry.reedy, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner, fredrikj |
| 2008-12-16 18:33:20 | skip.montanaro | set | messageid: <1229452400.39.0.130886056827.issue3439@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008-12-16 18:33:19 | skip.montanaro | link | issue3439 messages |
| 2008-12-16 18:33:18 | skip.montanaro | create | |