Message78976
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | ebfe, gps, gregory.p.smith, pitrou, vstinner |
| Date | 2009-01-03.17:08:37 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.0018435667 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1231002518.58.0.344967124374.issue4751@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I'm not sure about the approach of dynamically allocating self->lock. Imagine you allocate this lock while another thread is between ENTER_HASHLIB and LEAVE_HASHLIB. What happens on LEAVE_HASHLIB? The thread tries to release a lock it hadn't acquired (because the lock was NULL at the time). Is it simply ignored? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2009-01-03 17:08:38 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, gregory.p.smith, vstinner, gps, ebfe |
| 2009-01-03 17:08:38 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1231002518.58.0.344967124374.issue4751@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2009-01-03 17:08:38 | pitrou | link | issue4751 messages |
| 2009-01-03 17:08:37 | pitrou | create | |