Message79324
| Author | severb |
|---|---|
| Recipients | amaury.forgeotdarc, christian.heimes, pitrou, severb |
| Date | 2009-01-07.11:38:03 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.027194787 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1231328285.41.0.250809923509.issue4263@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Anyway :) Practically, the test does work on both py3k and another > implementation, so I don't see any urgency to remove anything from it. Indeed, it doesn't hurt keeping it. For completeness' sake I've updated your tests to cover the pre-flush condition existent in the python implementation. Theoretically this should be the desired behavior in any other implementation. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2009-01-07 11:38:05 | severb | set | recipients: + severb, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, christian.heimes |
| 2009-01-07 11:38:05 | severb | set | messageid: <1231328285.41.0.250809923509.issue4263@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2009-01-07 11:38:04 | severb | link | issue4263 messages |
| 2009-01-07 11:38:04 | severb | create | |