Message79736
| Author | aronacher |
|---|---|
| Recipients | aronacher, benjamin.peterson, georg.brandl, mark.dickinson |
| Date | 2009-01-13.11:45:17 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.032348707 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1231847118.51.0.605950819995.issue4907@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Indeed, it accepts parentheses in 2.6 now, but not in 2.5 or earlier. Why not the other way round? Somewhere there has to be a limit. And if you write down complex numbers you usually have the imaginary part after the real part. But let's try no to make this a bikeshed discussion. If you say that literal_eval can safely evaluate the repr() of builtins (with the notable exception of reprs that eval can't evaluate either [like nan, inf etc.]) and probably a bit more it should be fine :) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2009-01-13 11:45:18 | aronacher | set | recipients: + aronacher, georg.brandl, mark.dickinson, benjamin.peterson |
| 2009-01-13 11:45:18 | aronacher | set | messageid: <1231847118.51.0.605950819995.issue4907@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2009-01-13 11:45:17 | aronacher | link | issue4907 messages |
| 2009-01-13 11:45:17 | aronacher | create | |