Message81148
| Author | brett.cannon |
|---|---|
| Recipients | brett.cannon, christian.heimes, eric.smith, exarkun, loewis, ncoghlan, rhettinger, ross.light |
| Date | 2009-02-04.18:27:29 |
| SpamBayes Score | 3.661607e-10 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <bbaeab100902041027y431cef88w7f7b054507f75ecd@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1233755793.57.0.687776200099.issue4285@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 05:56, Eric Smith <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Eric Smith <eric@trueblade.com> added the comment: > > The doc string for sys includes: > version_info -- version information as a tuple > > I'm not sure changing this to "... as a structseq" makes it any more > useful, but it's more correct. Does anyone have a preference? Does "... as a named tuple" make sense? -Brett |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2009-02-04 18:27:32 | brett.cannon | set | recipients: + brett.cannon, loewis, rhettinger, exarkun, ncoghlan, eric.smith, christian.heimes, ross.light |
| 2009-02-04 18:27:30 | brett.cannon | link | issue4285 messages |
| 2009-02-04 18:27:30 | brett.cannon | create | |