Message81238
| Author | rsc |
|---|---|
| Recipients | akuchling, amaury.forgeotdarc, georg.brandl, jimjjewett, mark, moreati, mrabarnett, nneonneo, pitrou, rsc, timehorse |
| Date | 2009-02-05.23:52:48 |
| SpamBayes Score | 3.699659e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <dd6fe68a0902051552m1d86e0b2occ405e12390b06b7@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1233702489.78.0.189591899391.issue2636@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Named Unicode characters eg \N{LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A}
These descriptions are not as stable as, say, Unicode code
point values or language names. Are you sure it is a good idea
to depend on them not being adjusted in the future?
It's certainly nice and self-documenting, but it doesn't seem
better from a future-proofing point of view than \u0041.
Do other languages implement this?
Russ |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2009-02-05 23:52:51 | rsc | set | recipients: + rsc, akuchling, georg.brandl, jimjjewett, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, nneonneo, timehorse, mark, mrabarnett, moreati |
| 2009-02-05 23:52:49 | rsc | link | issue2636 messages |
| 2009-02-05 23:52:48 | rsc | create | |