Message81270
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | chemacortes, jcea, pitrou, rhettinger |
| Date | 2009-02-06.15:50:05 |
| SpamBayes Score | 4.6984871e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1233935408.58.0.0250616789136.issue5169@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I wouldn't qualify this as a bug. hash() doesn't need to be equal to the id() even in the default case. Actually, it may be better for hash() to be equal to id()/4 or id()/8, depending on the standard alignment of the memory allocator. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2009-02-06 15:50:08 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, rhettinger, jcea, chemacortes |
| 2009-02-06 15:50:08 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1233935408.58.0.0250616789136.issue5169@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2009-02-06 15:50:06 | pitrou | link | issue5169 messages |
| 2009-02-06 15:50:05 | pitrou | create | |