Message81714
| Author | Rhamphoryncus |
|---|---|
| Recipients | LambertDW, Rhamphoryncus, chemacortes, jcea, mark.dickinson, pitrou, rhettinger |
| Date | 2009-02-12.03:19:56 |
| SpamBayes Score | 1.0980765e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1234408799.19.0.711064837654.issue5186@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Testing with a large set of ids is a good demonstration, but not proof. Forming a set of *all* possible values within a certain range is proof. However, XOR does work (OR definitely does not) — it's a 1-to-1 transformation (reversible as you say.) Additionally, it still gives the unnaturally low collision rate when using sequential addresses, so there's no objection there. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2009-02-12 03:19:59 | Rhamphoryncus | set | recipients: + Rhamphoryncus, rhettinger, jcea, chemacortes, mark.dickinson, pitrou, LambertDW |
| 2009-02-12 03:19:59 | Rhamphoryncus | set | messageid: <1234408799.19.0.711064837654.issue5186@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2009-02-12 03:19:56 | Rhamphoryncus | link | issue5186 messages |
| 2009-02-12 03:19:56 | Rhamphoryncus | create | |