Message82321
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | christian.heimes, gregory.p.smith, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner |
| Date | 2009-02-17.11:49:49 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.0005079898 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1234871391.42.0.904532148239.issue4258@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Actually, I think my previous results were in 64-bit mode already. By the way, I don't think unconditionally using uint64_t is a good thing on 32-bit CPUs. uint64_t might be an emulated type, and operations will then be very slow. It would be better to switch based on sizeof(long) (for LP64 systems) or sizeof(void *) (for LLP64 systems). |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2009-02-17 11:49:51 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, gregory.p.smith, mark.dickinson, vstinner, christian.heimes |
| 2009-02-17 11:49:51 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1234871391.42.0.904532148239.issue4258@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2009-02-17 11:49:49 | pitrou | link | issue4258 messages |
| 2009-02-17 11:49:49 | pitrou | create | |