Message82404
| Author | mark.dickinson |
|---|---|
| Recipients | christian.heimes, collinwinter, gregory.p.smith, jyasskin, loewis, mark.dickinson, pitrou, schuppenies, vstinner |
| Date | 2009-02-18.03:32:10 |
| SpamBayes Score | 3.1832802e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1234927934.51.0.693592754595.issue4258@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Thanks very much for the timings, Victor. Just out of interest, could you try the pydigits script with the +optimizations patch on 32-bit? As mentioned above, there's a significant (for 30-bit digits) problem with x_divrem: the inner loop does a 32 x 64-bit multiply when it should be doing a 32 x 32-bit multiply (the variable q is declared as twodigits, but always fits into a digit). This is fixed in the +optimizations patch, and pi_digits is heavy on the divisions, so I wonder whether this might make a difference. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2009-02-18 03:32:14 | mark.dickinson | set | recipients: + mark.dickinson, loewis, collinwinter, gregory.p.smith, pitrou, vstinner, christian.heimes, jyasskin, schuppenies |
| 2009-02-18 03:32:14 | mark.dickinson | set | messageid: <1234927934.51.0.693592754595.issue4258@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2009-02-18 03:32:11 | mark.dickinson | link | issue4258 messages |
| 2009-02-18 03:32:10 | mark.dickinson | create | |