Message82448
| Author | gregory.p.smith |
|---|---|
| Recipients | christian.heimes, collinwinter, gregory.p.smith, jyasskin, loewis, mark.dickinson, pitrou, schuppenies, vstinner |
| Date | 2009-02-19.02:40:15 |
| SpamBayes Score | 3.3314132e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1235011217.97.0.764206340094.issue4258@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Here are the results from 32-bit x86 on core2 duo gcc 4.0.1 using pydigits_bestof.py 4000: 30-bit digits (14): 15719 ms 30-bit digits + optimizations (13+ops): 12490 ms unpatched py3k : 13289 ms (again, i had to manually add #define PYLONG_DIGIT_SIZE 30 to pyconfig.h for the longdigit13+optimizations patch). and pybench runs on the same builds vs unpatched: 30-bit digits (14): -1.4% (slightly slower) 30-bit digits + optimizations (13+ops): -0.2% (insignificant) My votes: Obviously use the optimized version (but fix the configure stuff). +0 for enabling it by default on 32bit builds. +10 for enabling it by default on 64bit builds. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2009-02-19 02:40:18 | gregory.p.smith | set | recipients: + gregory.p.smith, loewis, collinwinter, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner, christian.heimes, jyasskin, schuppenies |
| 2009-02-19 02:40:17 | gregory.p.smith | set | messageid: <1235011217.97.0.764206340094.issue4258@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2009-02-19 02:40:16 | gregory.p.smith | link | issue4258 messages |
| 2009-02-19 02:40:15 | gregory.p.smith | create | |