Message82611
| Author | benjamin.peterson |
|---|---|
| Recipients | amaury.forgeotdarc, benjamin.peterson, christian.heimes, exarkun, giampaolo.rodola, gregory.p.smith, ialbert, pitrou, rhettinger, wplappert |
| Date | 2009-02-22.21:31:59 |
| SpamBayes Score | 1.0300563e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1afaf6160902221331o47623422y5c802465b7cda9d@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1235332305.6778.1.camel@fsol> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Antoine Pitrou <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Antoine Pitrou <pitrou@free.fr> added the comment: > > What should we do about test_fileio, test_file and test_bufio? I changed test_file and test_bufio to test the open() implementations of each library. test_fileio should be fine because the implementation is the same for _pyio and io. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2009-02-22 21:32:00 | benjamin.peterson | set | recipients: + benjamin.peterson, rhettinger, gregory.p.smith, exarkun, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, christian.heimes, wplappert, ialbert |
| 2009-02-22 21:31:59 | benjamin.peterson | link | issue4565 messages |
| 2009-02-22 21:31:59 | benjamin.peterson | create | |