Message 82934 - Python tracker

Message82934

Author	benjamin.peterson
Recipients	benjamin.peterson, ggenellina, gregory.p.smith, jcea, pitrou, vstinner
Date	2009-02-28.18:19:01
SpamBayes Score	7.157687e-08
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1afaf6160902281019m1a6a92bewad0e0c6e2fc07e9@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to	<1235844770.25.0.583479216482.issue3618@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
2009/2/28 Antoine Pitrou <report@bugs.python.org>: > > Antoine Pitrou <pitrou@free.fr> added the comment: > > I don't know. The RLock is a lot slower than the normal non-recursive > variation, on the other hand I'm not sure we care about performance of > the Python version that much. Opinions welcome. I'm +0. The deadlock will only affect people specifically messing with the Python io implementation. It's low priority, so maybe we should just do it when RLock is rewritten in C.

Content

2009/2/28 Antoine Pitrou <report@bugs.python.org>:
>
> Antoine Pitrou <pitrou@free.fr> added the comment:
>
> I don't know. The RLock is a lot slower than the normal non-recursive
> variation, on the other hand I'm not sure we care about performance of
> the Python version that much. Opinions welcome.

I'm +0. The deadlock will only affect people specifically messing with
the Python io implementation. It's low priority, so maybe we should
just do it when RLock is rewritten in C.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2009-02-28 18:19:04	benjamin.peterson	set	recipients: + benjamin.peterson, gregory.p.smith, jcea, ggenellina, pitrou, vstinner
2009-02-28 18:19:02	benjamin.peterson	link	issue3618 messages
2009-02-28 18:19:01	benjamin.peterson	create