Message83045
| Author | forest |
|---|---|
| Recipients | akuchling, djarb, facundobatista, forest, giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, jafo, josiahcarlson, markb |
| Date | 2009-03-02.23:00:48 |
| SpamBayes Score | 4.7388264e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1236034852.66.0.634000936892.issue1641@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I'm looking forward to having this functionality in asyncore. It would help me remove some unwanted hackery from my own code. Giampaolo, I'm concerned that your patch uses a global 'tasks' list which cannot be overriden. Shouldn't loop() accept an optional task list argument, as it already does with the socket map? That would keep with the spirit of asyncore and make things easier for those of us who use multiple event loops in multiple threads. Josiah, is your updated sched module the one described in this blog post? Is there an issue in the bug tracker about it? http://chouyu-31.livejournal.com/316112.html |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2009-03-02 23:00:53 | forest | set | recipients: + forest, gvanrossum, akuchling, facundobatista, jafo, josiahcarlson, giampaolo.rodola, djarb, markb |
| 2009-03-02 23:00:52 | forest | set | messageid: <1236034852.66.0.634000936892.issue1641@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2009-03-02 23:00:49 | forest | link | issue1641 messages |
| 2009-03-02 23:00:48 | forest | create | |