Message83989
| Author | nneonneo |
|---|---|
| Recipients | akuchling, amaury.forgeotdarc, collinwinter, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, jaylogan, jimjjewett, loewis, mark, moreati, mrabarnett, nneonneo, pitrou, rsc, timehorse |
| Date | 2009-03-23.00:08:36 |
| SpamBayes Score | 1.1319752e-08 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1237766919.65.0.980749733401.issue2636@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Frankly, I don't really like that idea; I think it muddles up the RE syntax to have such a group-modifying operator, and seems rather unpythonic: the existing way to do this -- use .upper(), .lower() or .title() to format the groups in a match object as necessary -- seems to be much more readable and reasonable in this sense. I think the proposed changes look good, but I agree that the focus should be on breaking up the megapatch into more digestible feature additions, starting from the barebones engine. Until that's done, I doubt *anyone* will want to review it, let alone merge it into the main Python distribution. So, I think we should hold off on any new features until this raft of changes can be properly broken up, reviewed and (hopefully) merged in. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2009-03-23 00:08:40 | nneonneo | set | recipients: + nneonneo, loewis, akuchling, georg.brandl, collinwinter, jimjjewett, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, rsc, timehorse, mark, ezio.melotti, mrabarnett, jaylogan, moreati |
| 2009-03-23 00:08:39 | nneonneo | set | messageid: <1237766919.65.0.980749733401.issue2636@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2009-03-23 00:08:38 | nneonneo | link | issue2636 messages |
| 2009-03-23 00:08:37 | nneonneo | create | |